We do not store or log any keys or cryptographic material you enter.
The Crypto Safety Validator is intended for personal and
educational use only.
Avoid using online tools for protecting real production secrets.
Supported Encryption Algorithms and Hash Functions
The Crypto Safety Validator is a cryptographic algorithm validation
tool
that analyzes commonly used encryption and hashing techniques to detect
weak, deprecated, or misconfigured cryptography.
It acts as an encryption security checker aligned with modern security
standards.
Supported symmetric encryption algorithms include
AES, 3DES, DES,
Blowfish, and Twofish.
The validator evaluates encryption modes such as ECB, CBC, CTR, and GCM,
clearly identifying insecure configurations like
AES ECB mode,
which is known to leak data patterns.
For stream ciphers, the Crypto Safety Validator analyzes
ChaCha20 and RC4.
Deprecated algorithms like RC4 are flagged due to known statistical weaknesses,
while secure constructions such as
ChaCha20-Poly1305
are recommended for authenticated encryption.
The validator also inspects asymmetric cryptography including
RSA, DSA, and ElGamal.
Weak key sizes and unsafe configurations are detected using guidance from
NIST SP 800-131A.
You can experiment with
RSA encryption online
to understand secure key usage.
Popular hash functions such as
MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256,
and SHA-512 are validated for cryptographic safety.
Weak hashes like MD5 and SHA-1 are flagged due to collision attacks,
while secure hashes follow
NIST FIPS 180-4.
All validations performed by the Crypto Safety Validator are based on
trusted industry references such as
OWASP Cryptographic Storage Cheat
Sheet,
NIST,
and relevant
IETF RFCs.
Common Encryption Techniques
Modern applications rely on encryption to protect passwords, tokens, files,
APIs, and personal data. The Crypto Safety Validator helps
evaluate whether these encryption techniques are implemented securely
or expose applications to cryptographic risks.
Symmetric encryption is widely used for data-at-rest and bulk data
protection.
Algorithms like
AES encryption
and
Triple DES
depend heavily on secure modes, proper IVs, and strong keys.
Asymmetric encryption techniques such as
RSA
are commonly used for key exchange and digital signatures.
Improper key sizes or unsafe padding schemes can significantly weaken security.
Stream ciphers like
ChaCha20
and authenticated variants such as
ChaCha20-Poly1305
are recommended in modern cryptographic protocols.
Secure systems also rely on hashing and key derivation.
Tools such as the
SHA-256 hash checker
and
PBKDF2 / Argon2 password hashing
demonstrate secure approaches for integrity and password storage.
Support This Free Tool!
I build these tools to give you fast, secure, privacy-friendly utilities—free and
signup-free.
Buying me a coffee helps keep the project running and supports
new features.
Thank you for helping this tool thrive!
Common Encryption Mistakes Explained
Many cryptographic failures occur not because encryption is missing,
but because it is used incorrectly.
The Crypto Safety Validator detects common encryption mistakes that
frequently lead to real-world security breaches.
A critical issue is the use of ECB mode.
According to
NIST SP 800-38A,
ECB provides no semantic security and should never be used for sensitive data.
Another common mistake is relying on
deprecated cryptography such as DES, 3DES, RC4, MD5, or SHA-1.
These algorithms are no longer secure against modern attacks.
The validator also identifies improper key sizes,
such as RSA keys smaller than 2048 bits,
which violate
NIST recommendations.
Why Weak Cryptography Is Dangerous
Weak cryptography undermines authentication systems, encrypted files,
APIs, and secure communication channels.
For example, insecure cryptographic choices in JSON Web Tokens
can lead to account takeover.
Tools like the
JWT Decoder & Validator
help inspect token structures, while the Crypto Safety Validator
ensures the underlying cryptographic algorithms are secure.
By detecting weak encryption, deprecated algorithms,
insecure modes, and low-entropy inputs,
the Crypto Safety Validator promotes modern cryptographic
best practices recommended by OWASP and NIST.
Frequently Asked Questions on Cryptographic Safety
Yes. DES uses a 56-bit key, which can be brute-forced with modern
hardware in a
very short time. It is officially deprecated and should not be used for
any
security-sensitive purpose.
No. Triple DES is vulnerable to meet-in-the-middle attacks and has been
deprecated by NIST. It should be replaced with modern algorithms like
AES.
Yes. ECB mode encrypts identical plaintext blocks into identical
ciphertext
blocks, revealing patterns in the data. AES-ECB provides no semantic
security
and should never be used for sensitive data.
AES-CBC can be secure when used with a random IV and proper
authentication.
However, it does not provide integrity protection by itself.
Authenticated
encryption modes like AES-GCM are preferred.
Yes. ChaCha20 is considered secure and is widely used in modern
protocols.
It should be combined with Poly1305 for authenticated encryption
(ChaCha20-Poly1305).
RSA keys should be at least 2048 bits long. Keys smaller than this are
vulnerable to factorization attacks and are no longer considered secure.
No. MD5 is cryptographically broken and vulnerable to collision attacks.
It should never be used for password storage or security-sensitive
hashing.
Yes. SHA-1 is vulnerable to practical collision attacks and has been
deprecated by major standards bodies. Use SHA-256 or stronger
alternatives.